Pedobears/Progessives Drag Queens/SJWs Are Being Recruited as British  Law Enforcement Officers In Droves.

Pinch me…I must be in clown world…are unarmed pedobears, Drag Queens and SJWs are really being recruited as British  Law Enforcement Officers.

Law in enforcement in Cuckland top concern now, is putting on a fashionable rainbow drag show than actually servicing the people and protecting the law.

gay
Original source of post @IseultGruen88

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5002328/Officers-parade-costumes-paint-nails.html

cucked

cucked

 

#HonkHonk #ClownWorld

England:

Image result for britain's moped crime gangs

 

 

Image result for britain's moped crime gangs

 

Nigerian phone thieves in England say snatching IPhones from unwitting victums is like taking candy from a baby.

Is there any wonder why England is being torn apart? Where is the cops and the rule of law?

 

 

 

 

 

future

Brendon O’Connell- Israel Has Back Door on All Microsoft Devices

Brendon O’Connell- Israel Has Back Door on All Microsoft Devices

talpiot.jpg

Microsoft Windows 10 is now fully coded in Israel. The Windows Security Center. Updates. R&D. It’s all done in Israel. The NSA has to mess about to get their malware implanted in 90% of the world’s computers. Not Israel, they just include it with a forced update.

It’s official, Windows is now officially fully malware in its own right.

But it gets worse.

The Intel hardware backdoor is not limited to the “Management Engine.” There are dozens of “God Mode” registry entries that give access to the DEC – Deeply Embedded Core. The Goldman Sachs funded “Arc Processor”. This means a simple entry such as “0f3f” in machine code at the command line level will give full access to a system with full administrator privileges. Cybersecurity specialists are full time searching for these computational entries and there are potentially millions.

All of these dozens of software and hardware backdoors were implanted from around 2006 and on, when Intel moved to Israel.

The ramifications are catastrophic in nature. 

Israel is now deeply in bed with China and Russia on the massive Belt & Road project. No one is pulling up Israel and it’s massive technology theft out of the United States and elsewhere.

A sick, psychotic racial and religiously supremacist state with an ultra-right-wing extremist at the helm has the planet at its fingertips.

Now you know how Israel is so powerful.

Can they be stopped?

This is the most pressing and urgent issue…ever.

1 – ISRAELS SECRET WEAPON THE TALPIOT PROGRAM
How Israel totally dominates cybersecurity and has planted high-level corporate spys all over the world via their Talpiot Program run under Israeli military intelligence.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=babgv2qRf4k&t=1s

2 – ISRAELI DRONES WORLD WIDE
1. How Russia China & Israel work together for the One Belt One Road Project.
2. How Israel steals US technology and passes on to China, Russia and Iran.
3. How this is impacting on the Middle East.
4. I ring Homeland Security to make a complaint about Jewish Zionist spying in America – it a good one hour watch.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfHYJPebq4c

3 – BI BI’S GOT A KILL SWITCH AND HE LIKES TO USE IT
Israel has kill switched the entire planets critical infrastructure. From banking to hospitals to power grids to the Internet of Things and Military Industrial Complex of the United States. Israel is a cyber technology juggernaut.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C0Sw-4MsGQI

4. KOMPRAMAT | HOW ROGER STONE WORKED WITH ISRAELI & RUSSIAN INTELLIGENCE
Detailing how Roger Stones worked with A Wall Street sex worker to compromise targets of interest for the Israeli and Russian state intelligence apparatus.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnPNotP5PHU

5. DID RUSSIA & ISRAEL “RE-SHAPE” THE MIDDLE EAST FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE BELT & ROAD INITIATIVE?
The Oded Yinon plan was first postulated in the 1970s as a way to “re-shape the Middle East” for the benefit of Israel.
What it was really about is long term Soviet-era strategic planning to “re-shape” the Middle East for the benefit of The Belt & Road economic development under the CFR (Communism For Rothschild) and other Round Table Groups? The East India Trading Company writ large.
911 was meant to happen in 1992-3. The Israeli company lost the security contract in 1988. And 911 was over ten years behind schedule along with the Belt & Road Initiative. All praise to the New York Port Authority employee who spotted war criminal Avraham Shalom Bender and Zvi Malkin.
Israel should be called “Soviet Israel”.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R7sjnGtzodY

6. CHINA & RUSSIA STEAL U.S TECHNOLOGY VIA ISRAEL
The B.I.R.D, the B.I.R.D, the B.I.R.D is the word.
The Bi-national Industrial Research & Development Foundation.
The greatest security penetration…ever…is so funny you have to laugh. Its the only way to cope.
This is a catstrophe for the United States and it is in full view.
Russia got Israel to set up the Bi-national Science Foundation (B.S.F) in 1973 under Nixon and Henry Kissinger.
The B.I.R.D was set up in 1978, around the same time they set up The Talpiot Program.
And then they have the B.A.R.D – Bi-national Agricultural Research & Development Foundation.

Here it is…no one will talk about it.
http://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=%28title:42%20section:17337%20edition:prelim%29So, when you see BiBi bragging about how clever Israeli scientists are what he’s really saying, is his Russian immigrant scientists are very good at stealing US technology.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZuW0vhn-J9g
—–

Court Documents Show Mueller Involved in 9/11 Cover-up

Written by  C. Mitchell ShawSaturday, 27 January 2018increase font size

Court Documents Show Mueller Involved in 9/11 Cover-up

Recently uncovered court documents related to Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s time as FBI Director show his lack of anything resembling credibility. The man who is responsible for investigating allegations of Trump/Russia collusion was involved in releasing deceptive statements that helped cover up a Saudi family’s involvement in the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks that shocked America and helped launch the modern surveillance state.

Mueller led the FBI from September 4, 2001 to September 4, 2013. One week after Mueller assumed his new job, 19 al-Qaeda terrorists hijacked four airliners, using three of them to destroy the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in New York and severely damage the Pentagon in Washington, D.C. Nearly 3,000 people lost their lives that day and more than another 6,000 were injured, many of them later dying from their injuries.

Fifteen of the 9/11 terrorists were citizens of Saudi Arabia.

Over the years, evidence of Saudi involvement has continued to come to light. In September 2011 — 10 years after the attacks — Florida Bulldog, a non-profit watchdog news group based in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, published an excellent piece of investigative journalism revealing the existence of the secret FBI investigation of a Saudi family living in Sarasota, Florida, with apparent ties to the 9/11 attackers.

Mueller — who was still at the helm of the FBI at the time the article was published — was involved in the “public release of deceptive official statements about” that secret investigation, according to a recent article from the Bulldog. As the recent article says:

The misleading statements, issued by FBI officials in Miami and Tampa, were made within days of a September 2011 Florida Bulldogstory disclosing the existence of the investigation and reporting that Congress had been kept in the dark about it.

The statements sought to discredit the story, asserting that agents had found no connection between the Sarasota Saudi family and the 9/11 plot. In fact, the FBI’s own files contained at least three reports that said the opposite: that agents found “many connections” between the family and “individuals associated with the terrorist attacks on 9/11/2001.” The FBI released those reports later amid continuing Freedom of Information (FOI) litigation brought by Florida Bulldog.

The New American reached out to the Bulldog and spoke with Dan Christensen, the founder of the organization and writer of the article. Christensen is no newcomer to investigative journalism. After an award-winning career as an investigative reporter with the Miami Herald, he started the Bulldog in 2009 as a “nonprofit, independent and nonpartisan news organization that seeks to provide authoritative reporting in the public interest while upholding high standards of fairness and accuracy.”

When asked to what degree Mueller was responsible for the “deceptive statements” that “sought to discredit the story,” Christensen said, “We do not know for sure or completely that Mr. Mueller ordered the release of these deceptive statements.” Christensen added, “What we do know is that he was the FBI director at the time, we do know that this was called to his attention — that’s something we’ve just recently learned.” Not only was Mueller aware of the memo released by FBI agents, there is also a matter of “the timing,” Christensen said. “We do know that the timing of the memo of which he was apprised about that contained further inaccuracies was the same time — the same day — that at least one of these misleading statements was put out by the FBI in Tampa,” he told The New American.

As part of its efforts toward investigative journalism, the Bulldog engages in litigation — particularly filing Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests and court documents. The Bulldog website lists the documents referenced in its investigative reporting, and those documents are very revealing. For instance, the FBI — under the direction of Mueller — released a statement claiming, “At no time did the FBI develop evidence that connected the family members to any of the 9/11 hijackers as suggested in the article, and there was no connection found to the 9/11 plot.” However, the Bulldog website lists documents showing that this FBI statement is false.

As the Bulldog reported:

The same day the white paper was prepared for Director Mueller, Sept. 15, 2011, FBI Tampa Public Affairs Officer David Couvertier sent a similarly worded email to the Tampa Bay Times on behalf of Special Agent in Charge Steven E. Ibison: “At no time did the FBI develop evidence that connected the family members to any of the 9/11 hijackers as suggested in the article, and there was no connection found to the 9/11 plot.”

Florida Bulldog’s Miami attorney, Thomas Julin, filed court papers last week asserting a “red flag” has been raised in the case by disclosure of the FBI director’s involvement.

“That Mueller received a briefing about the Sarasota investigation suggests that the issues the Bulldog raised required the attention of the FBI’s highest authority,” Julin wrote.

The circumstances further suggest that Director Mueller approved the deception in which the FBI engaged.

Mueller did not respond to questions emailed to his office on Tuesday.

The two-page white paper, not attributed to any individual, is likewise interesting for what it did not tell Mueller. For example, it made no mention of the 2002 FBI reports stating that “many connections” were found between the al-Hijjis and the 9/11 hijackers. Nor did it discuss whether the FBI withheld the results of its Sarasota investigation from Congress, as former Florida Sen. Bob Graham, co-chair of Congress’ Joint Inquiry into 9/11, has said under oath.

So, Mueller — who is now the special counsel leading the probe into allegations of Trump/Russia collusion — was aware (as FBI Director) that the FBI made false statements denying that agents had found “many connections” between the Saudi family living in Sarasota and the 9/11 plot.

This information frankly does more than call Mueller’s credibility into question; it leaves it in tatters. In more than eight months of digging, the Mueller probe has produced nothing — innuendo and insinuation notwithstanding — to show that President Trump or anyone in his campaign colluded with Russia to influence the 2016 election. And yet the former FBI director turned special counsel has continued (and is continuing) to lead what increasingly looks a witch-hunt, even as evidence of his own wrongdoing in the cover-up of Saudi connections to 9/11 come to light.

Photo of Robert Mueller: White House

Bill Binney States that the NSA Has 32 Pages of Communications Between Seth Rich and Julian Assange, As Revealed by a FOIA Request

About six months ago, a blogpost by “Publius Tacitus” appeared regarding attorney Ty Clevenger’s FOIA request regarding Seth Rich:

“But now there is new information that may corroborate what the human sources quoted in the Fox article claimed about Seth’s role in getting the DNC documents to Wikileaks. Borne from a FOIA request filed in November 2017 by attorney Ty Clevenger, who requested any information regarding Seth Rich and Julian Assange. The NSA informed Clevenger in a letter dated 4 October 2018 that:

Your request has been processed under the provisions of the FOIA. Fifteen documents (32 pages) responsive to your request have been reviewed by this Agency as required by the FOIA and have found to be currently and properly classified in accordance with Executive Order 13526. These documents meet the criteria for classification as set forth in Subparagraph © of Section 1.4 and remains classified TOP SECRET and SECRET.

If NSA had come back and said, “No, we do not have anything pertaining to Seth Rich,” that would have been news. It would have been especially unwelcome news for those who believe that Seth was the source on the DNC emails. But now the opposite is true. The NSA says that it has documents that are classified TS and S. What do those documents say or prove? That remains to be seen.”

At the time this appeared, I felt that it was of high significance, but I wasn’t quite sure what it meant. What is meant by “any information regarding Julian Assange and Seth Rich?” Reports generated within the NSA that mention both? Communications in which either mentions the other? Direct communications between the two? What was the actual language of Clevenger’s request?

The final sentence of the blogpost seems to muddy the waters even more:

Eighth, the NSA has confirmed that it has Top Secret and Secret documents responsive to a FOIA request for information concerning contact between Seth Rich and other people including Julian Assange.

“And other people”?

Although I was somewhat confused by the meaning of this revelation, I commented on its significance. At the very least, it meant that the view that Seth was the source of the Wikileaks DNC releases was more than the brainless and callous conspiracy theory that mainstream media were making it out to be.

Fortunately, Bill Binney, one of the founding fathers of the NSA, and universally acknowledged to be one of the most brilliant people who ever worked for the U.S. government, has offered clarification on this issue in a brief interview with Ed Butowsky he gave two days ago.

In this interview, he offers a devastating rebuke of the fraudulence of the Mueller report’s analysis of “Russian hacking”. But the truly fascinating part occurs at about 6:40, where Binney discusses Clevenger’s FOIA request.

Here’s what Binney says:

“Ty Clevenger has FOIAed information from NSA asking for any data that involved both Seth Rich and also Julian Assange.

And they responded by saying we’ve got 15 files, 32 pages, but they’re all classified in accordance with executive order 13526 covering classification, and therefore you can’t have them.

That says that NSA has records of communications between Seth Rich and Julian Assange. I mean, that’s the only business that NSA is in — copying communications between people and devices.”

If Binney is interpreting this correctly — and bear in mind that, not only is he extraordinarily bright, but he is sometimes referred to as “the father of the NSA” — this provides strong support for the hypothesis that Seth was indeed Wikileaks’ source for the DNC emails it published. Assange has strongly hinted at this, Sy Hersh claims to have a trusted informant inside the FBI who states that he has seen FBI documents verifying this, and Binney himself says that he has two sources inside the intel community vouching for this.

(Go to the 8:30 mark — Binney inadvertently refers to “Seth” when he means “Sy”.)

Consistent with the possibility that Seth (or some other DNC employee) leaked the documents, Binney and colleagues have recently demonstrated that the DNC documents passed through a thumbdrive prior to their publication. There would have been no obvious need for such a transfer if Russians had hacked them remotely.

Beyond that, as Binney makes clear, the Mueller report’s tale of how Wikileaks received the DNC emails from GRU agents styling themselves as “Guccifer 2.0” is absurd on its face to reasonable people who will examine the pertinent evidence.

Astute cyberanalysts such as Adam Carter, the Forensicator, and Binney himself have presented compelling evidence that, far from being a Russian hacker masquerading as Romanian, G2.0 has operated in US time zones, down-loaded some of his “hacks” via thumbdrive, purposely implanted “Russian fingerprints” in the meta-data of some of his releases, made amateur attempts to impersonate a Russian using intermittently broken English, and never himself published any documents denigratory to the Clinton campaign. The GRU, if indeed they had hacked the DNC, would have had no need for such a ridiculous figure — but G2.0 functions wonderfully as a vehicle for incriminating Russia as the source of the DNC emails published by Wikileaks, tarring Russia and Assange with the same brush. G2.0’s contact with Wikileaks shortly (too shortly!) before the Wikileaks DNC release was evidently an attempt to produce a false trail that investigators (i.e. Mueller) could point to as G2.0’s hand-off of the DNC emails to Wikleaks.

And here’s another intriguing point. Crowdstrike’s co-founder Shawn Henry used to be Mueller’s deputy at the FBI, acting as head of the counterintelligence division. Adam Carter informs me that, while Henry headed that division, it made an attempt to destroy Wikileaks’ reputation by feeding it documents that had been purposely altered; fortunately, Wikileaks exercised its customary caution and refused to take the bait. G2.0 — very likely a creation of Crowdstrike — appears to have been another attempt to smear Wikileaks, one that has worked wonderfully well with much of the American public. Clinton’s incompetence was expiated, Wikileaks was smeared, and the Russia was further defamed, all in one stroke — the Deep State’s wet dream! Assange became, not a journalist working with an American whistleblower disgusted by the gross bias of the DNC against Bernie, but instead a tool of malign Russians intent on meddling in our democracy and saddling us with the ridiculous Trump.

And, as to Seth Rich’s mysterious death, ask yourself this: who would have been in a perfect position to destroy the “Russian hacking” narrative that Clinton’s campaign and Crowdstrike had decided to run with?

So let’s push to get the real story out. And, if it turns out that Binney is right, we’ll need to apologize to Russia, and then decide whom to send to prison for the rest of their miserable prevaricating lives.

Where is justice?’ Vietnam demands Monsanto pay victims of US Agent Orange chemical warfare

Vietnam is again seeking justice for the victims of Agent Orange, inspired by the multimillion-dollar verdicts against Monsanto in California. The biotech firm had supplied the US military with the chemical during the Vietnam War.

The Vietnam Association of Victims of Agent Orange (VAVA) has written a letter to a US court asking that it restart a class-action lawsuit by Agent Orange victims against American chemical firms, including Monsanto, which the Eastern District Court of New York dismissed in 2004, claiming a “lack of evidence” and asserting that“herbicide spraying.. did not constitute a war crime pre-1975.”

Also on rt.com

Citing two recent court rulings in San Francisco, where Monsanto’s Roundup was found responsible for health damages and the company was ordered to pay millions of dollars in compensation, VAVA asserted that it is time for the company to take responsibility for supplying the US military with Agent Orange during the brutal chemical warfare campaign (1961-1971) against Viet Cong guerilla fighters in which 12 million gallons of herbicide were used.

Dioxin, a highly toxic element of Agent Orange, has been linked to major health problems such as birth defects, cancers other deadly diseases. Stressing that Vietnam currently has more than 4.8 million Agent Orange victims, the letter asked for justice for people with hideous deformities.

Also on rt.com

“Where is the justice for Vietnamese victims who are being destroyed every day by the toxic chemical?” the letter asks.

Is all the scientific evidence, with people as living proof, and Vietnam’s environment ravaged by Agent Orange used by the US in a meaningless war from 1961-1971 still not convincing?

Monsanto, which was acquired by German giant Bayer AG last June, in the past argued that it was the US military that had set the specifications for making Agent Orange and decided on where and how the herbicide was used. The company also noted that it was just one of many wartime US government contractors who manufactured the toxin.

Also on rt.com

Last month a jury in San Francisco awarded $80 million in punitive damages to Edwin Hardeman after the court found that Roundup, Monsanto’s infamous glyphosate-based herbicide, was a “substantial factor” in causing non-Hodgkins lymphoma cancer. In a similar case in August 2018, Dewayne Johnson was awarded $289mn after developing cancer from long-term exposure to Roundup. After months of legal drama, the terminally ill cancer patient agreed to a reduced payout of $78 million.

U.S. arrests former Marine connected to North Korea embassy raid in Spain

U.S. arrests former Marine connected to North Korea embassy raid in Spain

A former US Marine was arrested in connection with an “especially violent” raid on the North Korean embassy in Madrid, Spain. 

Christopher Ahn – a member of a group which seeks the overthrow of North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, was expected to be arraigned on Friday in a Los Angeles federal court, according to Reuters, citing a law enforcement official and a source close to the group. 

On February 22 at approximately 3pm, at least 10 masked men carrying fake weapons broke into the embassy, tied up eight people, put bags over their heads, proceeded to beat and interrogate them for two hours, and stole electronics. One woman was able to escape through a second-floor window, and police were called after a neighbor heard her screaming. 

According to a detailed document made public on March 26 by the Spanish court, three of the intruders took an embassy official into the basement during the raid and tried to get him to defect from North Korea. 

When officers arrived at the embassy, a man opened the door and told them that nothing was going on. “Minutes later, two luxury vehicles sped out of the embassy,” according to the report. The getaway cars – belonging to the diplomatic mission, were abandoned in a nearby street. 

The anti-Kim group, which calls itself Cheollima Civil Defense, said the raid was not an attack and that it had been invited into the embassy.

The document included the names of the leaders of the group, some of whom are believed to be in the United States, while others could have left for other countries. The court is seeking their extradition. –Reuters

Of note, the Cheolima Civil Defense – now known as Free Joseon – has been noted for supporting North Korean defectors. On March 15, the Washington Post reported that Free Joseon was involved in the embassy raid. 

According to El Pais and El Confidencialthe group is tied to the CIA – however there has been no corroboration of this outside of their reporting. The CIA has denied any involvement, however Spanish government sources say their response was “unconvincing.” 

El Pais called the attack “especially violent.” 

If it is proven that the CIA was behind the attack, it could lead to a diplomatic spat between Madrid and Washington. Government sources say that it would be “unacceptable” for an ally to take such action. Not only would it mean that the US agency had operated on Spanish soil without asking for authorization or informing the authorities, it would also be a violation of the international conventions that protect diplomatic delegations. –El Pais

According to the report in El Pais, the intended goal of the attack was to obtain information on former North Korean ambassador, Kim Hyok Chol – who was expelled from Spain on September 19, 2017 over ongoing North Korean nuclear tests, by then-Spanish Foreign Minister Alfonso Dastis.

Kim Hyok Chol, who was declared persona non grata by Spain and was invited to leave the country before the end of the month, is currently one of Kim Jong-un’s highly trusted diplomats, and one of the architects of the failed nuclear summit between US President Donald Trump and Kim Jon[g]-un in Vietnam. The meeting, aimed at securing North Korea’s nuclear disarmament, ended in failure without any agreement on a timetable for disarmament or on future negotiations. –El Pais

Kim Hyok Chol also led the North Korean delegation which negotiated a nuclear disarmament plan with US special envoy Stephen Biegun in exchange for easing sanctions.  

Russian scholar of Asia and specialist in Korean studies Andrei Lankov noted in NK News last month that he suspects either the CIA or NIS of South Korea – as “both watch the North Korean opposition carefully and have multiple informers and willing collaborators within North Korean refugee groups, and both have a great deal of interest in Pyongyang’s secrets.”

Of these two, the CIA seems to be a far more likely candidate. The South Korean government has valid reasons to be nice to Pyongyang, and to do everything possible to keep negotiations between U.S. and North Korea going.

One cannot imagine how President Moon, who is working hard to project an optimistic vision of North Korea’s intentions, would authorize anything even remotely like this.

On the other hand, the North Korean opposition in the current political climate would likely not trust the NIS either, and would perhaps prefer to interact with the CIA.

There are some other indicators of possible CIA (or, at least, some ‘English-speaking forces’) involvement with “Cheollima Civil Defense.”

Does anything scream ‘CIA’ to you, dear reader, about an ex-Marine suspected of an “especially violent” hostage taking incident at the North Korean embassy in Madrid? If so, perhaps it was one of the intelligence community’s “six ways from Sunday” of getting back at Trump for attempting to broker a nuclear deal with North Korea. 

Yeah.. I Want A Hemp CBD-Infused Burger From 420 Friendly Hardees/ Carl Jr… Just Hold The Bacon!

Tomorrow, Hardeez/Carls Jr. will make 420 history with releasing a new hemp sauce burger on the proud American tradition of “National Smoke Weed Day.”

Look at it.. Warning you can’t eat your computer screen!

 

On April 20 (4/20)  the craze in cannabidiol—or CBD—is going to the fast food chains for the first time at their Denver, Colorado locations.

It’s called the Rocky Mountain High: CheeseBurger Delight with featuring CBD in the sauce.

You read it right, the 4/20 special sauce at Carl’s Jr. includes CBD for the happy hemp customer.

The special costs $4.20– it comes with two beef patties, jalapenos, pepper jack cheese — and about 5 milligrams of hemp-derived CBD extract.

This is sure to take the fast food industry to  higher levels of consciousness.

 

 

Smoke/Eat up while supplies last!

CNN:

 

“It is something that feels right for the brand,” (Carl’s Jr. senior vice president of brand marketing Patty Trevino) told CNN Business. “We are all about innovation…”

The chain first decided to explore CBD in January, after introducing a product based on another trend. Earlier this year, the chain announced a plant-based alternative to its signature burger in partnership with Beyond Meat.

“I was sitting down with our head chef Owen Klein, and we were talking about trends,” Trevino said. After the Beyond Meat launch, they came up with a wish list that included a CBD product. “We looked at ourselves and said, you know what, let’s try.”

Starting small, in a market where cannabis regulation is “really strong,” will allow Carl’s Jr. to figure out how to move forward. Testing CBD could give the company an edge over competitors, because most of its locations are in Western states, where recreational cannabis is legal.