1: Air force stand-down
1:1 It has become popular mythology in the media that fighter jets were
scrambled to intercept the hijacked planes. This is completely untrue as
the following research shows.
Guilty For 9-11: Bush, Rumsfeld, Myers, by Illarion Bykov and Jared Israel, 14 Nov 2001
1:2 Mr. Cheney’s Cover Story — Section 2 of Guilty For 9-11, 2 0 Nov 2001
1:3 9-ll: Nothing Urgent, by George Szamuely, Research & documentation by Illarion Bykov and Jared Israel, Jan 2002
1:4 Planes “did scramble” on 9/11, they just ” arrived late “
1:5 Scrambled Messages, by George Szamuely, 12 Dec 2001
1:6 Air National Guard Mission and Vision statements
1:7 Russian Air Force chief says official 9/11 story impossible
Scrambling of fighter jets to intercept stray aircraft is a routine
procedure. It happened 67 times in the 10 months between September
2000 and June 2001.
1.8 Use of military jets jumps since 9/11. Associated Press Aug 13 2002.
1.9 CBS News. Scrambling to prevent another 9/11 Aug 14 2002
1.10 Preventing another 9/11 Military.com
1.11 ABC News Jets on high Alert. Aug 13 2002.
1.12 Military now notified immediately of unusual air traffic events.
Fox news Aug 12 2002
So on Sept 11, 2001 – Why were no fighter jets scrambled, and why has a
cover up story been concocted?
In the unlikely event that the airfare failed through incompetence,
(not once but 4 times! ) where is the major inquiry?
I have seen bigger inquiries into car crashes at race tracks.———————————————————-
Section 2: Complicit behavior of G.W.Bush
It has become common mythology in the media that George W. Bush was at Booker Elementary School when
he learned of the first WTC crash. This is a lie. Why is Bush lying about where he was, and what he knew?
2:1 Guilty for 9-11 Section 3: Bush in the open by Illarion Bykov and Jared Israel.
And why do authorities keep telling us that nobody had ever conceived of planes being used in this manner,
2:2 Bush Was Warned of Hijackings Before 9/11; Lawmakers Want Public Inquiry ABC News May 16 2002
when the 1994 extract from Time magazine, quoted in the previous article demonstrates that the potential
problem had been recognized for decades?
This is not the only lie Bush has told about his movements that morning. See how many times he has
changed his story.
2:3 Sept 11 attacks- evidence of US collusion by Steve Grey.
(Read the section called “A tangle of lies”)
2:4 Bush Gets Tangled in his 9-11 Lies, Part 2: White House Cover-up Creates More Problems than it
Solves by Jared Israel and Francisco Gil-White [7 October 2002]
2:5 The President as Incompetent Liar: Bush’s Claim that he Saw TV Footage of 1st Plane Hitting WTC
Comments by Jared Israel [Posted 12 September 2002]
Clinton was impeached for lying about an affair. Bush is lying about where he was, what he was doing and
what he knew, during the crucial period between 8.45 and 9 AM on Sept 11.
2:6 Why did the President – after being told “America is under attack” continue to listen to schoolchildren
reading for another 25 minutes ? Why was he cheering, smiling and joking even as it was known that at
least one more hijacked plane was on the loose ? View the TV footage which proves treason at the top level.
http://www.emperors-clothes.com/indict/vid.htm———————————————————-Section 3: The Fictitious Hijackers
If 19 Arabs hijacked the planes, why are there no Arabic names on any of the passenger lists? If they used non Arabic
aliases, which of the “innocents” on the lists are alleged to be the hijackers?
Passenger and crew list for AA 11 (first WTC crash.)
AA 77 (Pentagon crash)
UAL 175 (2nd WTC crash)
UAL 93 (Pennsylvania crash)
If they are alleged to have been using non- Arabic aliases (19 obviously Arabic men got on board using non-Arabic
ID, with 100% success rate ?), why did the FBI claim that they were traced through the use of credit cards to buy
tickets in their own names?
3:5 If 9 of the alleged hijackers were searched before boarding, as claimed in this article
http://www.policetalk.com/9_hijackers.html why is there no airport security footage of them? How did they
(allegedly) get on board with knives, guns, AND electronic guidance systems, while being searched, but
avoiding security cameras and not
being on the passenger lists?
What aliases were they alleged to be using when they were searched, and
if they were not using aliases, why are they not on the passenger lists?
What of reports that some of the alleged hijackers are still alive, and
had nothing to do with the attacks ?
3:11 According to this article http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20021210/ts_nm/attack_germany_trial_dc_2 the FBI now
claims that the hijackers used gas to subdue the passengers and crew. If they used gas they would have been affected themselves – unless
they had masks. The story gets better all the time. They somehow got on board with masks, gas, guns, knives and electronic guidance systems,
in spite of being searched, didn’t show up on the airport security cameras, and were not on the passenger lists. They left flight manuals in Arabic
in rented cars outside the airport ( last minute brushing up on the way there, about how to fly the things!) and then crashed the planes in breath
taking displays of skilled piloting. Just to make sure we knew who they were, their passports were conveniently found in spite of fiery crashes
which incinerated the planes and occupants. So they got on board with false IDs but used their real passports ?
If the mythical Arab hijackers really were on the planes and airport security systems failed due to incompetence ( not once but 19 times! ),
where is the major inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries into racehorse doping scandals.———————————————————-Section 4: More oddities
Why the official story concerning the hijacking of AA11 (first WTC crash) cannot possibly be true.
4:1 9/11 Redux: (The Observer’s Cut) American Airlines Flight 11, Reexamined By David L. Graham
4.4 Former top German Cabinet Minister rejects official story of 9 11 attacks.
Interview with Andreas von Buelow. Tagesspiegel Jan 13 2002.
http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/VonBuelow.html———————————————————-Section 5: Where is the evidence against Bin laden?
Why is it that the US government doesn’t feel confident enough of it’s
case against Bin laden to lay any formal charges, but keeps ” finding”
convenient video ” confession” tapes ? Probably because new video
technology makes it impossible to distinguish between a real video
confession and a fake.
5:1 When seeing and hearing isn’t believing. by William M. Arkin. Washington Post Feb 1 1999
5:2 Last word in High Tech trickery. by David Higgins Sydney Morning Herald. May 16 2002
For more detailed evidence of a pre planned agenda to fabricate evidence against Bin Laden,
5:3 Sept 11 attacks- evidence of US collusion by Steve Grey.
(Read the section called “Evidence please !”)———————————————————-Section 6: Insider trading reveals high level foreknowledge
In the first few hours after the attacks, it was reported that investigators were already looking into huge
volumes of insider trading on airline stocks in the weeks leading up to the attacks.
Why has this story since completely disappeared? Do authorities seriously expect us to believe that
more than a year later, they still do not know who was responsible? Should not alarm bells have been
ringing BEFORE the attacks with these record volumes of trading?
If the executive director of the CIA had previously managed the firm which handled much of the trade,
are we seriously expected to believe that he doesn’t know who was responsible?
6:1 Suppressed Details of Criminal Insider Trading Lead Directly Into The CIA’s Highest Ranks–
CIA Executive Director `Buzzy’ Krongard Managed Firm That Handled `Put’ Options on UAL, by Michael C. Ruppert, 9 Oct 2001
6:2 Mystery of terror `insider dealers’, by Chris Blackhurst, 14 Oct 2001
6:3 Profits of Death — Insider Trading and 9-11, by Tom Flocco – Edited by Michael C. Ruppert, 6 Dec 2001
Where is the major inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries into local government contract scandals.———————————————————-Section 7: The pentagon frame up
7:1 It is alleged that that American Airlines 77 ( a hijacked Boeing 757 ) crashed into the Pentagon.
A Boeing 757 is a very large aircraft with a wingspan of 125 ft and a length of 155 ft. So how did it make an
initial hole 12 ft wide, collapsing only about a 35 ft depth of the outer ring of the building – and not leave any wreckage outside ?
This photo of the damage to the Pentagon wall http://184.108.40.206/june2aa.htm proves that whatever crashed into the pentagon
was NOT AA 77, which demonstrates the Pentagon attack to have been a self – inflicted frame up.
7:2 For a quick overview of the impossibility of the official story
For a full physical analysis of the crash scene
7:3 Physical and mathematical analysis of Pentagon crash. by Gerard Holmgren
Why was there a concerted effort to fabricate eyewitness evidence for the official story regarding AA 77?
7:4 Did AA 77 hit the Pentagon? Eyewitness accounts examined. by Gerard Holmgren June 2002
7:5 The Pentagon crash hoax
Section 8: If the Attack on Afghanistan was a retaliation for Sept 11,
why had it already been planned months before ?
8:1 BBC News report by George Arney.
8:2 U.S. Planned for attack on Al -Qaida. White house given strategy two days before Sept 11. NBC news. May 16 2002
8:3 US planned to hit bin Laden ahead of September 11 By David Rennie in Washington
Why were we originally told that the attack on Afghanistan was not planned prior to Sept 11,
and was purely a retaliation to a ” surprise ” attack, and the story then changed after proof of
the pre planned attack came to light ?
———————————————————-Section 9: U.S. and Bin Laden co-operate behind the scenes.
The new story is that they allegedly feared Bin Laden so much that they wanted to get him first.
So why didn’t they arrest him when they had the chance in July 2001?
The CIA met Bin Laden while undergoing treatment at an American Hospital last July in Dubai,
by Alexandra Richard, Translated courtesy of Tiphaine Dickson, Le Figaro, 11 Oct 2001
9:4 Bin Laden met with the CIA in July and walked away by Michael C. Ruppert
And why was the Bush family still in business with the Bin Laden Family, even AFTER Sept 11?
9:5 Osama bin Laden’s Bush family Business Connections, Alliance With Pakistan Will Stimulate Drug Trade,
Bring Revenues Under U.S. Control — Colombian Opium Production Will Soar; The Taliban’s Biggest Economic
Attack on the U.S. Came in February With The Destruction of Its Opium Crop by Michael C. Ruppert, 18 Sept 2001
9:6 Carlyle profit from Afghan war, by David Lazarus, 2 Dec 2001
9:7 Elder Bush in Big G.O.P. Cast Toiling for Top Equity Firm, by Leslie Wayne,
5 Mar 2001
9:8 The George W. Bush Money Tree
9:9 Bush Family’s dirty little secret: President’s oil companies funded by
Bin Laden family and wealthy Saudis who financed Osama bin Laden, by
Rick Wiles, Sep 2001
9:10 Arms Buildup Enriches Carlyle Group, Bush Sr. is Consultant, by Mark
Fineman, 10 Jan 2002
9:11 Gaping holes in the CIA V Bin Laden Story by Jared Israel
9:12 BushLaden by Jared Israel
9:13 Addition to the above article
9:14 Judicial Watch: Bush/Bin Laden connection “has now turned into a scandal”
Statement from Judicial watch with comments by Jared Israel
9:15 Bin laden. Terrorist monster: Take two ! by Jared Israel. Oct 9 2001
9:16 New Chairman of 9/11 Commission had business ties with Osama’s Brother in Law
by Michel Chossudovsky 27 December 2002
And why did the US turn down an offer to extradite Bin Laden in 1996, AFTER naming him as wanted for the 1993 WTC bombing?———————————————————-Section 10: The suspicious collapse of the World Trade Center Towers.
How did the WTC collapse? Why no serious inquiry? Why was the debris
rushed away for recycling before any examination could be held?
10:1 Muslims suspend laws of physics by J. McMichael Nov 25 2001
10:2 Muslims suspend laws of Physics. part 2 by J. McMichael
“Burning Questions…Need Answers”: Fire Engineering’s Bill Manning
Calls for Comprehensive Investigation of WTC Collapse, 4 Jan 2002
10:6 A firefighter says “we think there were bombs set in the building”
10:7 In Curious Battle: An expert recants on Why the WTC collapsed by John Flaherty and Jared Israel
10:8 Documentary footage from the scene of the WTC attacks, and
eyewitness accounts from firefighters at the scene reveal serious flaws
in the official accounts.
10:9 For a series of engineering articles and informative videos on the WTC
10:10 Evidence of explosives in South WTC Tower collapse
10:11 The World Trade Center demolition
10:12 Chapter 1 of the FEMA WTC collapse report (with comment)
10:13 Chapter 2 (with comment)
Steel melts at 1539 degrees. Jet fuel (kerosene) burns at 800 degrees.
Are we seriously expected to believe that burning kerosene towards the
top of the building ( heat travels upwards ) somehow caused both towers
to neatly implode in a manner identical to that of a controlled
Where is the inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries into suburban house fires. Why is discussion of the possibility of a controlled implosion completely taboo? Why do authorities keep inventing ridiculous stories about burning jet fuel melting steel?———————————————————-
Section 11: Hands off Bin laden !
Why were the FBI told to not investigate the Bin Laden family links in the US?
Has someone been sitting on the FBI? Transcript of a BBC Newsnight Report on “the questionable links of the bin Laden Family,” 6 Nov 2001
(added comments by Jared Israel)
11:3 Bush thwarted FBI probe against bin Ladens, Hindustan Times, 7 Nov 2001
US efforts to make peace summed up by `oil’, by Lara Marlowe, 19 Nov 2001
11:6 Called Off the Trail? FBI Agents Probing Terror Links Say They Were Told, ‘Let Sleeping Dogs Lie’
By Brian Ross and Vic Walker. ABC News Dec 19 2002
11:7 After capturing one of the six most wanted Taliban leaders, the US then let him go. “By mistake ” of course, because of “flawed intelligence.”
Taliban general ‘freed by mistake’ Sunday Times Dec 19 2002
11:8 US accidentally set wanted Taliban Leader free. Clari news dec 18 2002.
http://quickstart.clari.net/qs_se/webnews/wed/bn/Qus-attacks-taliban.RVGa_CDI.html———————————————————-Section 12: Its really not so surprising.
In 1962, the joint chiefs of staff approved a CIA plan to commit
terrorist acts against the US and frame Cuba.
12:1 Friendly Fire — Book: U.S. Military Drafted Plans to Terrorize U.S.
Cities to Provoke War With Cuba, by David Ruppe, 1 May 2001
12:2 Pentagon Proposed Pretexts for Cuba Invasion in 1962, The National Security Archive, 30 Apr 2001
12:3 Northwoods – a plan for terror to justify war. Comments by Jared Israel.
Scanned images of the actual document.
12.4 Page i http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-i.htm
12.5 Page ii http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-ii.htm
12:6 Page iii http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-iii.htm
12.7 Page 1 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-1.htm
12.8 Page 2 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-2.htm
12.9 Page 3 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-3.htm
12.10 Page 4 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-4.htm
12.11 Page 5 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-5.htm
12.12 Page 6 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-6.htm
12.13 Page 7 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-7.htm
12.14 Page 8 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-8.htm
12.15 Page 9 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-9.htm
12:16 Page 10 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-10.htm
12.17 Page 11 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-11.htm
12.18 Page 12 http://emperors-clothes.com/images/north-12.htm
12:19 US military schemes- ominously like 9/11.
If such tactics were considered normal and acceptable practice by the
Government in 1962, what evidence is there that things have changed?
12:20 Henry Kissenger advocated a similar strategy in 1992
12:21 as Did Zbigniew Brzezinski in 1997.
A War in the Planning for Four Years. HOW STUPID DO THEY THINK WE ARE?
Zbigniew Brzezinski and the CFR Put War Plans In a 1997 Book – It Is “A
Blueprint for World Dictatorship,” Says a Former German Defense and NATO
Official Who Warned of Global Domination in 1984, in an Exclusive
Interview With FTW by Michael C. Ruppert
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/zbig.html———————————————————-Section 13: Who created and funded the Al Qaida Network?
13:1 A Vital Piece of the Puzzle: Dollars for Terror — The United States and
Islam, by Carol Brouillet ·
13:2 Bin Laden in the Balkans – Collection of mainstream media articles.
Compiled by Jared Israel
13:3 The Creation called Osama by Shamsul Islam
13:4 “Articles documenting US creation of Taliban and Bin Laden’s terrorist network”
Series of links to different articles
13:5 “Osama Bin Laden: Made in USA” by Jared Israel
13:6 “Bush and the media cover up the Jihad schoolbook scandal” by Jared Israel
13:7 U.S. Protects Al-Qaeda Terrorists in Kosovo, by Umberto Pascali, 2 Nov 2001
13:8 Which Terrorists are worse? Al Qaida? Or the KLA? by Jared Israel
http://emperors-clothes.com/analysis/kla-aq.htm———————————————————-Section 14 : Who created the civil war in Afghanistan?
14:1 Interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski, President Jimmy Carter’s National
Security Adviser [Posted 6 October 2001]
Ex- National Security Chief Brzezinski admits: Afghan war and Islamism
were made in Washington
http://emperors-clothes.com/interviews/brz.htm———————————————————-Section 15: Why have the President and Vice President resisted an inquiry into Sept 11?
15:1 Bush asks Daschle to limit Sept. 11 probes CNN Jan 29 2002.
15:2 Bush, GOP blast calls for 9/11 inquiry. CNN May 17 2002
15:3 Daschle: Bush, Cheney Urged No Sept. 11 Inquiry Reuters news wire UK May 26 2002
15:4 Bush and Cheney Block 9-11 Investigation By Mike Hersh Oct 24, 2002, 2:22 pm
2:2 Bush Was Warned of Hijackings Before 9/11; Lawmakers Want Public Inquiry ABC News May 16 2002
15.5 Bush opposes 9/11 query panel. CBS News. May 23 2002.
Why could jets be scrambled for Payne Stewart, but not against the hijacked airliners?
By Timothy J. Burger
Monday, March 3, 2003 Posted: 4:41 PM EST (2141 GMT)
Monday, March 3, 2003 Posted: 4:41 PM EST (2141 GMT)
The panel charged with figuring out why the FBI, the CIA and other federal agencies were unable to stop the Sept. 11 terrorist plot is about to seek a huge budget boost.
Sources tell TIME that commission chairman Thomas Kean has concluded that the $3 million allotted in legislation passed late last year is not nearly enough. He is expected to ask Congress for $12 million to $15 million. That’s a fivefold increase, but still far less than the $50 million allotted for the probe of last month’s space-shuttle catastrophe.
The panel got off to a slow start last year when its first chairman, Henry Kissinger, resigned rather than comply with financial-disclosure and potential-conflict requirements. Now, three months after the commission was signed into law, most of its members still don’t have the required security clearances — including Kean, though sources tell TIME his is expected to come through soon.
Kean is contemplating a staff of at least 50 divided into several task forces that will sift through classified documents and interview current and former officials. One reason for the increased budget: the commission wants to hire its own staff and not rely on officials on loan from the very agencies under investigation.
“They want people independent of the agency,” said one source. “Everybody’s got oxen to grind.”
The commission also has yet to receive a copy of the highly classified 800-plus-page report from last year’s joint House-Senate inquiry on 9/11. Meanwhile, Congress is still wrangling with intelligence and law-enforcement agencies over how much of its report can be made public.